Things that made me say “yes” – or “no”, by SJ Bradley

This is the first in a series of behind-the-scenes glimpses into the production of The Mechanics’ Institute Review Issue 14. Over the next few months, you’ll hear first-hand accounts from some of the people involved in the process, describing the stage in which they’re taking part, and their personal experience of it. Our aim is to provide an insight into what publishing an issue of MIR entails, which we hope will be of interest to writers, readers and would-be editors alike.

The first post is by SJ Bradley, one of the volunteers recruited to help the editorial team sift the initial set of over 240 submissions and draw up the longlist. The submissions – from which the authors’ names had first been removed – were divided between 4 groups, each comprising 5 people, including a group leader. Each group read between 65 and 71 submissions, with a subset of 10 submissions being read by all 4 groups, as a kind of litmus test for their decision-making. To ensure we had a view of the complete picture, one member of the editorial team read all of the submissions.

 


 

Things that made me say “yes” – or “no”

In February this year when I saw that Birkbeck were looking for filter readers for MIR14, I said to myself, “Why not?”

Plenty of times I’ve been on the other side of the table. Carefully crafting stories, folding them up into an electronic envelope, and sending them out. Sometimes I’ve been lucky. Had stories published, or shortlisted. But more times than that, more times than I care to count, I’ve been unlucky. Stories for which I had high hopes have disappeared into the ether without so much as a: “We’re sorry, but this wasn’t for us.”

I found myself curious to know: what kinds of stories fill the submissions pile, and what kind of things make a sift reader say “yes”, “no”, or “maybe”?

After getting in touch with Sue [Sue Tyley, MIR14 managing editor] at Birkbeck, I received a vision document. The aims of MIR14 were, among others, to encourage diversity, to give voice to stories that often go unheard; it sounded right up my street, and I couldn’t wait to get stuck in.

1. The standards are high

This is the first thing, and it’s a big thing. Sometimes it was easy to say no: bad spelling, weird punctuation, a concept and approach that didn’t marry up. (While errors in punctuation and spelling can be addressed during copy-editing, in some of the stories I saw they were symptoms of something more fundamental.) Some stories had lots of promise, but not the craft to back it up (more on that later.) There were stories that grabbed me from the first sentence and didn’t let go until the end. And in between those two last points, was everything else.

The standard was high in the pile of stories I read. They covered a broad range of subjects, of settings, approach and voice. Each story that had a shortcoming, had a strength to make it up. How can you compare two stories that both have an equally compelling strength, and lots of things to merit them? It’s no easy task.

Ultimately, I often found myself putting forward stories that felt genuine – and that had good craft at a prose level.

2. Ideas compelling, execution not quite there

I read some stories with brilliant concepts. Often, I found myself sympathising with an author’s viewpoint, and what they were trying to say.

Sadly, not all of these lived up to their promise. I saw many that pulled in too many directions: where the narrative started with one idea, then veered off to another, and went all over without a unity of theme or narrative to draw it all together.

Subversion of expectations is a great thing if you can pull it off, but sometimes it felt as though the author themselves didn’t have a clear idea of where the narrative was heading, resulting in a story that meandered, and felt confused.

3. Too much writing, not enough story

There were lots of stories in my “maybe” pile, where the author could obviously write well, but hadn’t managed to create a compelling narrative. I’d be hooked by a brilliant first line, then read on, eager to know what came next … only to find the story didn’t go anywhere.

No matter how well you can write, it’s important not to create a static narrative. A story has to be well written, and go somewhere, even if the action is small and quiet. Without both, it isn’t a short story.

4. Unconvincing voice

In my stack of stories, there were many that grappled with difficult issues, often told from the viewpoint of somebody vulnerable. In my view, authors shouldn’t shy away from writing stories like this.

However, sometimes I found myself unconvinced. When the story was being told from the point of view of a narrator who’s in the story, it’s important to convince your reader with great characterisation. In some stories, I felt as though I was hearing the author’s voice, rather than the character’s – an important, but necessary, distinction.

5. Stopping, rather than ending

In a short story, there’s little room for manouevre. No room for slackness, or for wasting words. I felt the pressure of this in the way some of the stories ended.

Some stories felt as though they were heading to a point of climax, to a hidden revelation, then just stopped, without ever quite delivering. This was disappointing to me as a reader – it sometimes felt as though the writer had reached their word count, and merely stopped writing.

The stories that were a clear “yes” had satisfying endings: maybe they didn’t end with a bang, but they had some kind of emotional resolution. Two characters who have known each other a long time start to see their relationship in a new way, for example. There has to be a sense of closure, even in an open ending. These were the stories to which I said “yes.”

Reading for MIR14 has been such a satisfying and fascinating experience: I’ve learned so much about the standard of writing that makes it into an anthology like this, and about the reasons why a reader would say “yes” or “no”. Most of all though, the thing I have loved above everything else, has been reading some wonderful stories.

 

 

Featured image taken from the MIR13 Cover

March 15, 2017

The Mechanics of MIR14 – #1: Sifting

Things that made me say “yes” – or “no”, by SJ Bradley
March 15, 2017

MIRLive Celebrates International Women’s Day

Sue Tyley and Stella Klein round up our MIRLive International Women’s Day Special
March 13, 2017

Waterstones, Piccadilly Circus by Shaniqua Harris

Short Fiction by Shaniqua Harris
March 6, 2017

Weekend in the Cairngorms by Odette Brady

Short Fiction by Odette Brady
March 1, 2017

March Reads

The MIROnline team have chosen the books they are enjoying this month.
February 28, 2017

K J Orr Headlines MIRLive

BBC National Short Story Award Winner KJ Orr headlines our International Women’s Day event. 
February 23, 2017

Fishing by Alexandra Melville

Poetry by Alexandra Melville
February 20, 2017

Saturday’s Soup by S.A. Edward

Short Fiction by S.A. Edward
February 13, 2017

The Meme

Short Fiction by Toby Litt
February 6, 2017

Afters by Stella Klein

Short Fiction by Stella Klein
January 23, 2017

Leila Segal Headlines MIRLive

Leila Segal reads from her debut collection, Breathe. MIRLive’s Alison Hitchock shares work from her letter writing project, From Me To You. Leila and Alison are joined by five more wonderful women reading poetry and short stories.
January 16, 2017

A Long Way Through by Matt Hutchinson

Short Fiction by Matt Hutchinson
January 13, 2017

Luca’s Trip to Havana by Leila Segal

Leila Segal shares a story from her debut collection; Breathe: Stories from Cuba (flipped eye, 2016). Leila also talks to Melanie Jones about her writing, Cuba, and small publishers in this interview. You can buy a copy of Breathe here. Leila will be reading at MIRLive on January 30th and copies of Breathe […]
January 12, 2017

January Reads

The MIROnline team have chosen the books they are enjoying this month.
December 10, 2016

Books for your Christmas List

The MIROnline team have chosen the books they are most enjoying this month, just in time to for you to add them to your Christmas List.
November 1, 2016

Recommended Reads November

The first of our monthly book recommendations. The MIROnline team have chosen the books they are most enjoying this month.
October 25, 2016

MIRLive December 5th

Our next MIRLive takes place on December 5th at the Harrison, 28 Harrison Street, King’s Cross, WC1H 8JF. This will be a Christmas Special and we are looking for work inspired by folk tales, fairy tales and magic. The deadline for Submissions is November 18th.
October 24, 2016

Writers Wanted

Nomads writing group recruiting for new members.
October 20, 2016

Stefanie Seddon wins the 2016 Bristol Short Story Prize

The 2016 Bristol Short Story Prize has been won by Stefanie Seddon, who has just completed an M.A. in Creative Writing at Birkbeck, University of London. The Prize is a prestigious international writing competition open to writers worldwide which is now in its 9th year, and received 2,160 entries this year. […]
October 9, 2016

Sowing Seeds by Melanie Jones

A short story by Melanie Jones first published in MIR11