To the Longlist – a whittling challenge, by Tamara Pollock


This is the second in a series of behind-the-scenes glimpses into the production of The Mechanics’ Institute Review Issue 14. Over the next few months, you’ll hear first-hand accounts from some of the people involved in the process, describing the stage in which they’re taking part, and their personal experience of it. Our aim is to provide an insight into what publishing an issue of MIR entails, which we hope will be of interest to writers, readers and would-be editors alike.

The second post is by Tamara Pollock, a member of the editorial team (a returning member – this is her third time on the team) and leader of one of the four groups who between them read the initial set of over 240 submissions and drew up the longlist. Each group was allocated between 65 and 71 submissions, from which they were asked to select around 17 to 20 to go forward to the next stage. The groups’ selections were then combined to make the overall longlist. It was Tamara’s job, as group leader, to manage the process by which her group agreed their selection.



To the Longlist – a whittling challenge

On Thursday 16th March, the five members of our selection team met at Gordon Square – in Birkbeck’s School of Arts building, former home of Virginia Woolf, so an auspicious venue – to whittle the seventy-one stories on our list down to fifteen or twenty. Our first task was to identify those that had earned a resounding “yes” or “no” and put them aside. The bulk of our three-hour session we kept for discussing the “maybes”. As we tallied our verdicts, I was excited that the stories I’d been gearing up to argue for were, on the whole, the stories we all loved.

Next came those submissions about which we were mostly in agreement – where the enthusiasm of one team member was sufficient to turn all our “maybes” into a “yes”. These too were despatched to the longlist. Then came the trickier ones, whose premise, for example, might be fresh and appealing but which were otherwise unwieldy, or tended to skim the surface of the narrative rather than immerse us in their world. Others we eliminated because, though structurally sound, the story didn’t take us with it, or we saw the characters through the wrong end of a telescope so that nothing they did seemed to matter that much. Some could have been longer; some were not at all small like a bullet. In several cases, we felt the story fulfilled our brief of originality, diversity, giving voice to the silenced, that it was pointed and relevant and topical and, despite some flaws, could be turned into something that glowed, and these also made the longlist.

Meanwhile we were running out of time. We had allotted five minutes for discussion of each story but some debates took longer than others. At eight fifteen, we had a longlist that wasn’t long enough. Had we been too rigid, too unforgiving? We decided to revisit the list and that each person would speak on behalf of a story that she felt strongly about but that hadn’t made it. This was where our divergence of opinion was most evident. How hugely differently people read! What conflicting elements we value in fiction. Just because I favour stories that make me laugh doesn’t mean my team-mates should, and just because a story ticks every box on our vision statement, but lacks soul, doesn’t mean it should make it either. So we all had to give ground – quite a lot of it at that stage. But I think and hope each of us got a crack at unearthing the best possible selection from the stories we had been allotted. We wanted, above all, to be proud of it. As we cleared away the crisp packets at two minutes to nine, one of our team summed up our experience. “I didn’t get everything I wanted, but I know we have a really strong list, so I’m happy.” And so were we all. And a bit knackered.

No matter how often I go through this process, it’s always a surprise, always an intense learning experience, entirely worth the time and effort – which is just as well, since now we have our overall longlist it’s time to start reading again, to select the shortlist.


Featured image taken from the MIR13 Cover

April 4, 2017

The Mechanics of MIR14 – #2: Longlisting

To the Longlist – a whittling challenge, by Tamara Pollock
April 3, 2017

Unstuck by Dave Wakely

Short Fiction by Dave Wakely
March 30, 2017

Poetry Live!

An amazing line up of poets for our Arts Week Special
March 27, 2017

The Excursion by Sarah Armstrong

Short Fiction by Sarah Frances Armstrong
March 20, 2017

Watching You Watch Me

Short fiction by Jay Merill
March 15, 2017

The Mechanics of MIR14 – #1: Sifting

Things that made me say “yes” – or “no”, by SJ Bradley
March 15, 2017

MIRLive Celebrates International Women’s Day

Sue Tyley and Stella Klein round up our MIRLive International Women’s Day Special
March 13, 2017

Waterstones, Piccadilly Circus by Shaniqua Harris

Short Fiction by Shaniqua Harris
March 6, 2017

Weekend in the Cairngorms by Odette Brady

Short Fiction by Odette Brady
March 1, 2017

March Reads

The MIROnline team have chosen the books they are enjoying this month.
February 28, 2017

K J Orr Headlines MIRLive

BBC National Short Story Award Winner KJ Orr headlines our International Women’s Day event. 
February 23, 2017

Fishing by Alexandra Melville

Poetry by Alexandra Melville
February 20, 2017

Saturday’s Soup by S.A. Edward

Short Fiction by S.A. Edward
February 13, 2017

The Meme

Short Fiction by Toby Litt
February 6, 2017

Afters by Stella Klein

Short Fiction by Stella Klein
January 23, 2017

Leila Segal Headlines MIRLive

Leila Segal reads from her debut collection, Breathe. MIRLive’s Alison Hitchock shares work from her letter writing project, From Me To You. Leila and Alison are joined by five more wonderful women reading poetry and short stories.
January 16, 2017

A Long Way Through by Matt Hutchinson

Short Fiction by Matt Hutchinson
January 13, 2017

Luca’s Trip to Havana by Leila Segal

Leila Segal shares a story from her debut collection; Breathe: Stories from Cuba (flipped eye, 2016). Leila also talks to Melanie Jones about her writing, Cuba, and small publishers in this interview. You can buy a copy of Breathe here. Leila will be reading at MIRLive on January 30th and copies of Breathe […]
January 12, 2017

January Reads

The MIROnline team have chosen the books they are enjoying this month.
December 10, 2016

Books for your Christmas List

The MIROnline team have chosen the books they are most enjoying this month, just in time to for you to add them to your Christmas List.